Bible led me to the Islam..11

Mujtaba Alam
5 min readOct 19, 2018

THE RESURRECTION

Before discussing the resurrection, it should be

mentioned that the holiday of Easter, the

supposedly day of Jesus’ resurrection was

originally a pagan festival honoring Eostre, a

Teutonic (Germanic) goddess of light and spring.

At the time of the vernal equinox (the day in the

spring when the sun crosses the equator and day

and night are of equal length), sacrifices were

offered in her honor. As early as the eighth

century, the name “Easter” was used to designate

the annual celebration of the resurrection of

Jesus. 15 Again, the Christians have taking the

ignorance of paganism and associated it with

Jesus.

So where do Christians get the belief of the

resurrection from? They got it from the teachings

of Paul (Acts 17:18). Paul, who said he was an

appointed apostle by Jesus according to his own

vision. He never saw Jesus, declared Jesus as the

Son of God (Acts 9:20), and admitted that the

resurrection was his gospel (II Timothy 2:8). So

Christianity in its present belief that the

crucifixion/resurrection is necessary for the

redemption of sin is not a teaching of Jesus.8 The

sins of people were being forgiven before the

alleged crucifixion or resurrection as shown in

Mark 2:5:

And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the

paralytic, “My son, your sins are forgiven,” and

Luke 7:48: And he said unto her, “Thy sins are

forgiven. “

Further, knowing that Jesus forgave sins before

the crucifixion or resurrection contradicts the

belief that the blood of Jesus as washing away

sins. For according to Deuteronomy 24:16:

“The father shall not be put to death for the

children, nor shall the children be put to death

for the fathers; every man shall be put to death

for his own sins.”

This belief of present day Christians is of Paul’s.

Paul justified his doctrine with the use of Romans

7:1–4:

Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to

them that know the law) how that the

law hath dominion over a man as long

as he liveth? For the woman which hath

a husband is bound by the law to her

husband so long as he liveth; but if the

husband be dead, she is loosed from the

law of her husband. So then; if, while

her husband liveth, she be married to

another man, she shall be called an

adulteress: but, if her husband be dead,

she is free from the law, so that she is no

adulteress, though she be married to

another man. Wherefore, my brethren,

ye also are become dead to the law by

the body of Christ; that ye should be

married to another, even to him who is

raised from the dead, that we should

bring forth fruit unto God.

The above-mentioned verses clearly show that

Paul made a distinction between Jesus and Christ.

According to his reasoning, the law which had

bound Jesus and his followers was no longer

necessary since Jesus had died. Now they were no

longer “married” to Jesus but to Christ, who had

brought another law in a direct revelation to him

(Paul). It was, therefore, necessary to follow

Christ and not Jesus. Thus, anyone who held to

Jesus’ teaching had gone astray_ It was the use of

this reasoning that Paul assembled his doctrine of

redemption and atonement. Jesus never taught this

theory. It was a great success, since, in so many

words, it preached that a man could do what he

wanted and not face the inevitable consequences

of his actions, provided that, at the end of the day,

he said: “I believe in Christ.” However, the basic

premise on which Paul’s reasoning was based is

false, since Jesus was neither crucified nor

resurrected. His doctrines of redemption and

atonement are fallacious. 7

Do you know that the doctrine of atonement was

accepted by the church three to four centuries after

Jesus left the earth?8 Read Deuteronomy 24:16,

Jeremiah 31:30 and Ezekiel 18:20 and you will

see that this doctrine of atonement contradicts the

Old TestamentlmLaw:

Deut 24:16

“The fathers shall not be put to death for the children,

neither shall the children be put to death for the

fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own

sin.”

Jeremiah 31:30

“ …everyone shall die for his own iniquity;”

Ezekiel 18:20

“A child shall not suffer for the iniquity of a parent, nor

a parent suffer for the iniquity of a child; the

righteousness of the righteous shall be his own, and the

wickedness of the wicked shall be his own.”

Now read Matthew 7:1 & 2, and 1 Corinthians

3:8. There is no reason for atonement of “original

sin” for Matthew 19:14 clearly states that children

(everybody at one time) belong to the kingdom of

Heaven. This notion of “belonging to the kingdom

of Heaven” is in line with the Islamic belief that:

“Every newborn child is born in complete

submission to Allah (as a Muslim). Then his

parents change him/her into Judaism, Christianity

or Magianism. “

Further, Jesus states in Mark 11 :25–26 and Luke

11:1–4 that trespasses (sins) are forgiven by God.

So, there is no reason for Jesus’ atonement of sins.

Mark 11:25–26

“And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought

against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may

forgive you your trespasses. But if ye do not forgive, neither

will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.”

Luke 11:1–4

And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain

place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him,

Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples. And

he said unto them, “When ye pray, say, Our Father which

art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come.

Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Give us day by

day our daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also

forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into

temptation; but deliver us from evil.”

Once again, Jesus came not to destroy the law. It

was Paul who abolished the [Mosaic] law. Read

Acts 13:39:

“And by him that believes are justified fn,!co all

things, from which ye could not be justified by

the law of Moses.”

The “authority” that Paul amassed allowed him to

claim that the blessings of the Gospel were not

limited to the Jews, but to all who believed.? This

also is an absolute contradiction to the mission,

purpose and teachings of Jesus. Jesus’ true

message was the law. The same law that guided

Adam, Abraham, Moses, Noah and all the other

prophets, to include the prophet of Islam Mohammed,

who is prophesied in the Bible as

mentioned in the Quran.

--

--